Read More »
-
Fur Farms
Fur farms in the U.S. are the only sector of animal agriculture unregulated by the federal government.
-
THE SLAUGHTER HOUSE: THE HORRIFYING CRUELTY
The horrors that go on in the slaughter house are something the meat industry do not want you to know.
-
If slaughterhouses had glass walls, we would all be vegetarian.
-Paul McCartney
-
Animal-slavery enterprise
Violence is the only way to make wild animals perform unnatural tricks. Training sessions are comprised of beatings in order to establish superiority.
-
Vivisection
Vivisection is the act of cutting, drugging, burning, blinding, shocking, addicting, shooting, freezing, infecting and surgically mutilating live animals.
Showing posts with label fur farms. Show all posts
Pamela Denise Anderson
(born 1 July 1967) is a Canadian-American actress, model, producer, author,
activist, and former showgirl, known for her roles on the television series
Home Improvement, Baywatch, and V.I.P.
One of Anderson's campaigns as a member of
PETA has been against the use of fur. In 1999, Anderson received the first
Linda McCartney Memorial Award for animal rights protectors, in recognition of
her campaign. In 2003, Anderson stripped down for PETA's "I'd Rather Go
Naked Than Wear Fur" advertising campaign.
On 28 June 2006, Anderson posed naked with
other protesters on a window display of the Stella McCartney boutique in London,
England. It was a PETA gala event before the PETA Humanitarian Awards. Anderson
went inside the boutique and said she would take her clothes off if the event
raised enough money for PETA, which it did.
She campaigned against Kentucky Fried
Chicken. In 2001, Anderson released a letter in support of PETA's campaign against Kentucky
Fried Chicken, stating "What KFC does to 750 million chickens each
year is not civilized or acceptable." She later made a video about KFC's
treatment of chickens.[50] In January 2006, Anderson requested that the
Governor of Kentucky remove a bust of Colonel Sanders, the founder of KFC, from
display but her request was refused even when she offered her own bust in
exchange. In February 2006, Anderson decided to boycott the Kentucky Derby
because of its support for Kentucky Fried Chicken.
She has also campaigned against seal
hunting in Canada. In March 2006, Anderson asked to speak to Prime Minister
Stephen Harper about the annual seal hunt but she was refused. In May 2006, she
petitioned random individuals on the street for their opinion on the Canadian
Seal Hunt. In December 2009, Anderson, photographed in a t-shirt with a drawn
picture of a seal pup on it, was featured in a new ad campaign for PETA. She
appears next to the headline "Save the Seals" in the ad and urges the
public to help end "Canada's annual seal slaughter."
She joined forces with PETA in a campaign
for the boycott of fruit-juice maker POM. The "Pom Horrible Campaign"
has resulted in the company halting animal tests. In March 2005, Anderson
became a spokesperson for MAC Cosmetics’ MAC AIDS Fund, which helped people
affected by AIDS and HIV. After becoming the official spokes model, Anderson
raised money during events in Toronto, Tokyo, Dublin, and Athens. Anderson
became the celebrity spokesperson for the American Liver Foundation, and served
as the Grand Marshal of the SOS motorcycle ride fundraiser. She wrote an open
letter to President Barack Obama urging the legalization of cannabis.
Anderson became the center of controversy
when she posed in a bikini nearly nude for a PETA ad that was banned in
Montreal, Canada on grounds that the ad was sexist. Anderson retorted saying,
"In a city that is known for its exotic dancing and for being progressive
and edgy, how sad that a woman would be banned from using her own body in a
political protest over the suffering of cows and chickens. In some parts of the
world, women are forced to cover their whole bodies with burqas – is that next?
I didn't think that Canada would be so puritanical."
She became a company spokesperson for FrogAds,
Inc. in March 2012.
Read More »
What does Republican Matthew Scully, the former senior speechwriter for George W. Bush, have in common with Ohio's ultra Democrat and former presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich? The same thing Russell Simmons, Erykah Badu and Joaquin Phoenix have in common with Cesar Chavez, Pythagoras and Leonardo da Vinci. Besides capturing the hearts and minds of generations, all are vegan. By not wearing fur, leather, wool, silk and down, nor consuming milk, cheese, eggs, honey and the meat of any land or marine animal, they made a compassionate decision to directly save the lives of thousands of animals.
Animals had an inherent right to be free and live completely unfettered by human domination, I wondered why it takes so much time to attain this nonviolent awakening.
I began to ask, "Who taught me that animals were put on this Earth for food? Who taught me to disrespect animals and view them as mere commodities? Who stole my compassion, my empathy and my conscience? Who lied to me? Who instilled this vicious mindset of human-to-animal exploitation as standard operating procedure?"
If every meat, dairy and egg-eater logically and compassionately re-evaluated their beliefs, they would understand why veganism is the only ethical and acceptable way to live on this planet.
Isaac Bashevis Singer, the compassionate Jewish humanitarian who escaped Nazi-occupied Poland, once condemned every animal-exploiter by stating, "What do they know—all these scholars, all these philosophers, all the leaders of the world? They have convinced themselves that man, the worst transgressor of all the species, is the crown of creation. All other creatures were created merely to provide him with food, pelts, to be tormented, exterminated. In relation to them [animals], all people are Nazis; for the animals it is an eternal Treblinka."
Singer's indictment is probably the most damning statement ever about humankind. It establishes the fact that violence is violence and murder is murder even if the victims have beaks, horns, gills, feathers or fur.
It's important to note that animals were the first victims of slavery, oppression and murder. Humans perfected these psychotic techniques on animals before using them on each other. In the last 12 months alone, tens of billions of animals worldwide were enslaved, murdered, dismembered or tortured by the food and clothing industries, in vivisection experiments, by hunters, in rodeos, circuses, and zoos, making the Animal Holocaust the largest and longest-running Holocaust of all time.

You can also compare the two Holocausts this way. Go to the nearest cow or pig slaughterhouse and remove the animals and replace them with humans. You have now re-created Birkenau. If you travel back in time and remove the Jews from Birkenau and replace them with cows or pigs, a Holocaust is still taking place. During my 2012 lectures in Israel, after showing a new slaughterhouse video, I asked thousands of people the following: "How come if the animals in that video were dogs or cats, you'd be outraged? If they were kids, you'd be screaming bloody murder! Instead the victims are cows and chickens and fish and all of a sudden no one cares, it's okay? So I'm a little confused here. Is the slaughterhouse a problem? Or is the problem who's getting killed in the slaughterhouse? It's a HOUSE OF SLAUGHTER. Why does it even exist? Especially in a country that loves to say, 'NEVER AGAIN. IT'LL NEVER HAPPEN AGAIN.' I got some news for ya. The Animal Holocaust was happening long before the Jewish Holocaust, during the Jewish Holocaust and it's still happening today. It's time for Israel to become the first nation on this planet to abolish concentration camps once and for all."
The global atrocity of eating animals kills more innocent beings in one year than all human atrocities over the past 5,000 years combined! This makes veganism the most important aspect of animal rights because almost every animal who is abused and killed on this planet is abused and killed by the meat, dairy and egg industries, despite the fact that no one in this day and age needs meat, cheese, milk and eggs to survive. The only exception would be people residing in icy environments or desert settings. But eating animals for pure survival is rare with only around 1 percent of the earth's population being able to use this excuse. Keep in mind, this is just a valid excuse and NOT a justification. I understand why they do it. I wouldn't do it under any circumstances, but I understand their motives. Everyone else on this planet eats animals and the things that come out of animals for four reasons: Habit, convenience, taste and tradition. With the addition of the profit motive, those are invalid, unnecessary and barbaric reasons to intentionally harm animals.
Meat, dairy and egg-eating societies are also the main cause of world hunger as they continually feed around 50 percent of the world's corn, wheat, oats and soy to 60 billion land animals and tens of billions of marine animals (fish-farming) instead of hundreds of millions of starving people! Every two to three seconds, someone on this planet dies from malnutrition while pigs and cows get fat. Consequently, meat, dairy and egg-eaters are anti-human because feeding billions of animals instead of millions of hungry children is an indirect form of genocide.
Worldwide, around 60 billion land animals [10 billion in the USA] and 90 billion marine animals [18 billion in the USA] are killed and eaten every year in a monumental Holocaust borne of ignorance, arrogance and racism. The human race v. animal race brand of racism permits humans to enslave and kill any other species with impunity. Singer calls speciesism the "purest form of racism" because it kills more innocent beings that any form of human-to-human racism.
This is why vegans are the utmost humanitarians. We indiscriminately seek justice for all by doing unto others as we would have done unto ourselves [THE GOLDEN RULE].
As an ethical vegan, it's logical for me to proclaim that the only nice slaughterhouse is an empty slaughterhouse. This statement, however, is often challenged by uninformed, egocentric individuals who believe mercy and kindness are exclusive to humans. But to deny every animal's inherent right to fly, swim and run freely is cruel and dishonest. If given an option, no animal would choose pain or death.
To understand the compassionate movement of animal rights, empathy must be used to examine the issue from the animals' point of view. This isn't a radical concept either. Abolitionists looked at slavery through the eyes of subjugated blacks, just as the Allied Forces looked at Nazism through the eyes of Jews and other non-Aryans whom Hitler labeled unworthy and expendable. Empathy allows people to understand the injustice without over-analyzing the issue, especially when those in power deem the victims unworthy and expendable, something Hitler, slave-owners, and meat, dairy and egg-eaters have all done to their respective victims.
In an attempt to defile the animal rights movement, meat, dairy and egg-eaters often proclaim that Hitler practiced vegetarianism. However, biographers Albert Speer and Robert Payne attested to Hitler's love for liver dumplings, stuffed squab [pigeon], ham and sausage. German Chef Dione Lucas wrote about Hitler's carnivorism in her Gourmet Cooking School Cookbook, published in 1964. Rynn Berry's Hitler: Neither Vegetarian Nor Animal Lover describes how Goebbels, The Third Reich's propaganda minister, tried to sell Hitler as a vegetarian to make him seem as peaceful as Gandhi. The next section in this series, HITLER WAS NOT VEGETARIAN, provides ample evidence that, contrary to a good deal of popular misconception, Hitler and his henchmen were not vegetarians at all.
Were you also aware that animals in the meat, dairy and egg industries receive no legal protection whatsoever? After all, slavery and slaughterhouses cannot co-exist with freedom and protection. Here's an excerpt from section two of the Animal Welfare Act (AWA), the federal law that oversees animal-use in America: "When used in this act, the term "animal" ... excludes farm animals, such as, but not limited to, livestock and poultry used or intended for use as food ..." That's pretty cute, isn't it? The animals who are enslaved or eaten aren't even recognized as animals under the law. Does this remind you of another piece of legislation that ignored the victims and existed to shield victimizers from prosecution? When the Constitution was first enacted, only land-owning, slave-owning, white men of European descent were protected. Blacks, Natives, women and many others were conveniently excluded.
The AWA, kosher and halal-style killings, and the free-range/freedom/organic/cage-free/antibiotic-free/hormone-free/grass-fed/buying local marketing terms are used to manipulate people into thinking that meat, dairy and egg production can be done happily and humanely. But there is no such thing as happy and humane slaughter just as there is no such thing as happy and human rape, happy and humane slavery, or happy and humane child molestation. From the animals' point of view, anyone who commodifies their bodies is equally vicious. And if for some reason my aforesaid words aren't proof enough of the terrorism claims I'm lodging against the meat, dairy and egg establishments—and the people who consume these products—maybe the billions of dead, dismembered animal bodies consumed annually could count as proof.
Fortunately, de-programming the perfunctory ways of meat, dairy and egg-eaters is possible. The University of North Texas opened a vegan dining hall in 2011, a New York elementary school turned its cafeteria vegetarian in 2013, and the Victor Valley Medium Community Correctional Facility in Adelanto, California, successfully ran a vegan rehabilitation program, just to name a few. My lectures convert thousands to veganism annually while thousands more significantly reduce their meat, cheese, milk and egg intake. Reduction and abolition are the only options to end this massacre. Welfare regulations are a stamp of approval to let the carnage continue unabated because compassionate ways of enslaving and killing billions of animals do not exist.
This is why we shouldn't be a fan of legislation. Fighting for bigger cages or "better" treatment of animals is contradictory and ridiculous. It will never lead to empty cages. When examining human liberation movements, you'll notice that Malcolm X and Dr. King didn't fight for "better" treatment of blacks via improved segregation policies. They wanted to abolish segregation. They fought for equality and freedom. Cesar Chavez fought for it, too. Same thing when Gandhi liberated India from British rule. If abolition instead of welfare were somehow legislated, I'd be down for that. But I don't believe you can legislate until you educate. Passing welfare laws—which won't be enforced anyway—without explaining why it's evil to commodify animals is backwards.
In America, each meat, dairy and egg-eater is responsible for the deaths of 3,000 land animals and thousands of other marine animals throughout their lifetime. Meat, dairy and egg-eating, however, is not an instinctive behavior. It is learned tradition. Scientific claims of the human body being omnivorous or carnivorous are erroneous and illogical. If someone placed a two-year old child in a crib with a bunny rabbit and an apple, the child would play with the rabbit and eat the apple, an unambiguously herbivorous reaction. People become inured to the taste of blood, flesh, veins, muscles, tendons, cow secretions [milk], hen-ass droppings [eggs] and bee vomit [honey], as I will discuss in the "Humans Are Herbivores" section.
Since veganism is for anybody who wants to be kind to animals, good to the environment and healthy, millions of Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu, atheist, black, white, Asian, Latino, Native, pro-life, pro-choice, pro-gun and anti-gun people live a vegan lifestyle. Millions of Democrats, Independents and Republicans are vegan as well. Tales of tree-hugging liberals being the only supporters of veganism couldn't be further from the truth. Scully's Dominion is a right-wing, faith-based, Christian conservative view supporting veganism because ethnicity, religious affiliation or political party have no bearing on eating a veggie burger tonight instead of a hamburger.
Read More »
Minks, foxes, cattle, otters, ferrets, chinchillas, are part of the group of animals used to produce leather for clothing and upholstery.
Hunted animals for their skin
The animals hunted for their fur will face a horrible and brutal death: either be caught in snares or traps that will suffer in agony until the end, or, as in the case of seals will be killed with blows to the head.
Fur Farms
Many of the animals who are exploited for their fur are confined in cages on fur farms. The 85% of European production is native fur farmed animals.
Lives confined in cages
The suffering that these animals suffer while allowed to live is overwhelming. When living in the wild they all need large areas to live and thrive. On farms the conditions to which they are subjected, living in small and dirty cages metal, the mentally unbalanced so that they fall into behaviors ranging from convulsive movements repeated until self-mutilation of limbs or tails.
Rape of females
Breeding techniques are specially designed for females to have the highest number of births before they themselves are executed when their performance decreases.
Killing of animals for the fur industry
.jpg)
For mink, foxes, chinchillas and ferrets their lives will last until the thickness of your skin friendly enough to be marketed. At that time they will be killed by methods that try to produce less damage to your valuable skin: lethal injection, suffocation, electrocution. Sometimes they are torn skin while the animals are still alive.
Animal Materials
To make a fur coat only needed, depending on the animal's skin that it has been started, the following number of animals: 300 chinchillas, 17 bobcats, 20 baby seals, 8 adult seals, 60 mink, 20 otters, 20 foxes, martens 60, 250 squirrels, 12 wolves.
Countries that have banned fur industry
The United Kingdom banned fur farms in 2000, and are also banned in Austria and Serbia. Irish governments have resisted prohibition, protecting a tiny but wildly destructive industry. The five remaining fur farms in Ireland are the only cause of continuing releases of mink, sometimes by accident and sometimes attacks. They are also the place of astonishing cruelty, where sentient individuals are confined to cages the size of a few boxes of shoes. The Irish Government is considering the disappearance of farms from 2012. But Ireland is a small player. Two thirds of the world's mink farms and 70% of foxes are in other EU countries. Only Denmark produces 40% of global supply of mink pelts. Other countries where a ban discussion are Sweden and Norway.
Read More »
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)